#Scale down image logoist manual
#Scale down image logoist mac

Today, I would like to share with you some background on the process of designing such an exciting environment.Īfter finishing Legacy of Romulus, and after much thought and discussion, we decided we wanted to create a Space Adventure Zone that was set in a Dyson Sphere. Yet, because ultimately the font imager extrapolates the pixel rendition from the vector data, quantum effects occur where the imager may decide on adding or not a pixel on the flip of a coin : what do you do when the width of a character is 11.50 pixels ? Seems the answer is not quite straightforward.Hello Captains! SWallrus, Lead Environment Artist for Star Trek Online, here!Īs some of you may already know, our upcoming content update, Season 8: The Sphere, will for the first time ever in STO feature exploration in a Dyson Sphere. Internal font precision is far, far beyond the 11 pixels, so it should have been possible. Not long ago, when the issue of the caret being off in the Xojo IDE because character width is fractional and errors accumulate I tried to devise an OpenType font that would generate precise pixels values. The only way to do it was with bitmap fonts. Vector was not precise enough to achieve that.

#Scale down image logoist mac

In the late 1990s I had a special order from a customer who needed a font with exactly the same rendition on Mac and Windows. In essential there is a low-res description in them too.Īnd then there were the times before what was its name Adobe Type Manager? when we had to carry a lot of bitmap fonts in our suitcases so the screen display could be called WYSIWYG. Lines would have to be strengthened if they would drop below 1 px (or more) on the output device.

Thats why early PostScript fonts introduced hinting to give the RIPs better methods to preserve readability for smaller sizes.

#Scale down image logoist manual

Only through a patient manual process could the best effect be reached. In some of my programs, I have redrawn the app icons for sizes 48 and under, so they look better at these sizes. No matter the quality of the original, it will always suck at 24x24 and under. Incidentally, that is the reason why simply reducing the size of a 1024x1024 icon is not possible beyond certain limits. They have been drawn by artists who master contrast of color, optical illusion and other tricks that allow their work to both look crisp and not show jaggies. Anti aliasing can somehow alleviate the jaggies, but at the price of crispness.Ĭommercial icons such as what Ulrich mentions are not the result of mechanical production, would that be vectors or larger images reduction. Same thing for larger pictures shrunk to size. No matter the kind of vector technology used, it will always land on a matrix of pixels.

With 32x32 or 48x48 pictures, the problem is similar. Anything else than vertical and horizontal lines will look jagged. I have worked for years with fonts, which are originally vectors, and their poor rendition on 72 dpi screens.Īt 12 points, a character displays on something like an 11x11 pixels matrix.

I am not quite sure vector support would solve the issue of inherently poor resolution.