The court struck down a Louisiana abortion restriction law that would have made it much harder for women in that state to get abortions. We got a big abortion case and a somewhat surprising abortion case. So Adam, tell us about this latest Supreme Court ruling on Monday.

michael barbaroĪ lot of the time, in June, every year. Once in a while, the spotlight swings my way. We were all just joking if it’s a Monday in June, it’s Adam Liptak time. Adam Liptak on what the decision tells us about the court and its chief justice. Today: The Supreme Court issues its first major ruling on abortion since President Trump appointed a conservative majority. michael barbaroįrom The New York Times, I’m Michael Barbaro. Davis Lin Why the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required doctors performing the procedure to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Transcript Listen to ‘The Daily’: A Major Ruling on Abortion Hosted by Michael Barbaro produced by Luke Vander Ploeg and Michael Simon Johnson with help from Asthaa Chaturvedi and edited by M.J. While he has on occasion disappointed his usual conservative allies, notably on the Affordable Care Act and adding a citizenship question to the census, nothing in his 15-year tenure on the court compares to the recent run of liberal votes in major cases. In the past two weeks, the chief justice has voted with the court’s liberal wing in three major cases: on job discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workers, on a program protecting young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers and now on abortion. added his crucial fifth vote to those of the court’s four-member liberal wing, saying that respect for precedent compelled him to do so, even though he had voted to uphold an essentially identical Texas law in a 2016 dissent. Instead, conservatives suffered a setback, and from an unlikely source. WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday struck down a Louisiana law that could have left the state with a single abortion clinic, dashing the hopes of conservatives who were counting on President Trump’s appointments to lead the court to sustain restrictions on abortion rights and, eventually, to overrule Roe v.

Pill reminder cases